Template talk:Modernism (music)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconClassical music
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this template or visit the project page for more details.
WikiProject iconMusic/Music genres task force Template‑class
WikiProject iconTemplate:Modernism (music) is within the scope of the Music genres task force of the Music project, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardize music genre articles on Wikipedia. Please visit the task force guidelines page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us assess and improve genre articles to good article status.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Stravinsky[edit]

Why is there not Stravinsky? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.51.88.187 (talk) 16:05, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Composers not in category[edit]

The above composers are not in Category:Modernist composers. Hyacinth (talk) 08:50, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Surely Strauss should be? Certainly the composer of Salome, Elektra deserves some recognition. Most importantly, the quote names him in "Recent musicological approaches": it seems inconsistent to leave him out? Byronmercury (talk) 14:55, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Organization[edit]

Hyacinth (talk) 08:50, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See: Template:Microtonal music, Template:Neoclassicism (music), Template:Twelve-tone technique, & Template:Futurism (music). Hyacinth (talk) 10:11, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]