Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. I noticed that you recently removed content from Gordon Getty without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hey man im josh (talk) 10:54, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
HI. CAN You please help me with this administrator guy? It is simply incorrect to say that Caroline Beddell lives in Farnborough. This is very damaging information to have on the site. Kalorama20008 (talk) 23:25, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
For an independent review that won't be decided by me, you must request unblock per the instructions in the notice that you removed from this page. Those instructions can also be found in a more verbose form at WP:GAB. Any review will be conducted by someone else. 331dot (talk) 23:41, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
But you are publishing like damaging and harmful information that is like really really wrong Kalorama20008 (talk) 01:33, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The Canaletto paintings were not sold. They were never sold. When you say they were sold, that costs my family $40,000,000.00. It is inaccurate, but also damaging. Kalorama20008 (talk) 01:34, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
When you say Caroline Beddell runs farnborough, that is also millions of dollars in misinformation that is no longer correct. People will look at this cite and its wrong Kalorama20008 (talk) 01:35, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The National trust relies on this site, and so if something is inaccurate, its can make millions of dollars of difference in a matter of hours, like it cost me today Kalorama20008 (talk) 01:37, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It wasn't an ego thing. You were actively hurting me. I was trying to use the system, but I have an audio processing disorder and it makes the symbols really hard for me. And its like you thought it was funny, but what you did today to me was not nice, Kalorama20008 (talk) 01:41, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK, this, "I am an officer with the Government. It appears that you have been using secrets of our contractor. Please be advised that you have been referred for Tier 2 investigation at your nearest Federal government facility to be fingerprinted on site. Have a good day. You will receive additional communication by mail", there really is no coming back from that--unless it starts with an apology. Drmies (talk) 01:41, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thats literally what they say to you like every week in the government. LEAVE MAINE and dissavow your schadenfreude Kalorama20008 (talk) 01:45, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That took me all day to figure out, but do you see my husband in front of his house? Kalorama20008 (talk) 01:55, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I see a picture of a man standing in front of a building. I don't know that it's your husband or that either of you own the building displayed. Are you going to request unblock or not? 331dot (talk) 07:13, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
331dot, I'm not exactly sure what "Thats literally what they say to you like every week in the government" means, but it smells like "NOTHERE: please revoke TPA". So ordered! Drmies (talk) 14:16, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. I noticed that you recently removed content from Gordon Getty without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hey man im josh (talk) 10:54, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
