Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log
Featured list tools: |
This is a log of featured lists from Wikipedia:Featured list candidates, with the most recent at the top. Discussions about unsuccessful nominations are located in the failed log.
Candidacy discussion about lists promoted in this calendar month is being placed at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured log/April 2024. Summary logs of articles promoted by year are also maintained; the most recent log is at Wikipedia:Featured lists promoted in 2024.
Full current month log
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of World Heritage Sites in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe has five sites on the list and two tentative sites, so this list is on the shorter side. Standard style. The list for South Africa is already seeing support so I am adding a new nomination. Tone 10:00, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- MPguy2824's comments
- "One site is transnational, the Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls is shared with Zambia." seems a bit odd. you can either replace the comma with a semi-colon OR go with "Mosi-oa-Tunya / Victoria Falls is the only transnational site (it is shared with Zambia).
- Consider linking "dry season".
- " In dry season, the floodplains are an important refuge to large mammal communities, including African elephant, hippopotamus, African buffalo, waterbuck, zebra, together with the predators such as lion, leopard, cheetah, as well as Nile crocodile." to " In the dry season, the floodplains are an important refuge to large mammal communities, including the African elephant, hippopotamus, African buffalo, waterbuck, zebra, together with predators such as the lion, leopard, cheetah, as well as the Nile crocodile."
- "Eastern black rhinoceros lived here at the time of inscription but the remaining animals have since been moved for safekeeping elsewhere." to "Eastern black rhinoceroses used to live here at the time of inscription, but the remaining animals have since been moved for safekeeping elsewhere."
- Will do a full prose review later. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:26, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- with trade links to China, Persia, and Kilwa Kisiwani. Kilwa Kisiwani doesn't seem to as important as the other two large areas. If it is important to keep, then add ", in present-day Tanzania" to the end of that sentence.
- "abandoned around 1450" to "abandoned around the year 1450"
- "Like the latter, it was built in dry stone technique in a similar architectural style" to "Like the latter, it was built using the dry stone technique and in a similar architectural style".
- "and was an important regional centre of trade, with porcelain form China and Spain found among archaeological remains" - split this part into a new sentence and correct "form" to "from".
- "Along the border between Zimbabwe and Zambia, the Zambezi river creates massive waterfalls, with the width of 1,708 m (5,604 ft) and the maximum height of 108 m (354 ft)." to "Along the border between Zimbabwe and Zambia, the Zambezi river creates a massive waterfall, with a width of 1,708 m (5,604 ft) and a maximum height of 108 m (354 ft).".
- "Falling water creates" to "The falling water creates".
- "created in millions of years of erosion" to "created over millions of years of erosion".
- Wikilink "Kopje".
- "in different manners" to "in different ways".
- "the life of foraging people" to "the life of the foraging people". -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:44, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed all, thanks! I changed the link of Kilwa Kisiwani to the Kilwa Sultanate, since this was a power that ruled most of the east African coast at the time and is thus important. Tone 17:01, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support on prose and table accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:04, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- "Mana Pools are" => "The Mana Pools are"
- "the floodplains are an important refuge to large mammal communities" => "the floodplains are an important refuge for large mammal communities"
- "Eastern black rhinoceroses used to lived here" => "Eastern black rhinoceroses used to live here"
- "Matobo Hills feature" => "The Matobo Hills feature"
- "representing one of the densest concentration" => "representing one of the densest concentrations"
- That's it! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:37, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 23:11, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 16:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [2].[reply]
List of games by Supermassive Games
Supermassive Games is the company behind games such as Until Dawn, The Quarry, and The Dark Pictures Anthology. I figured it was time to change things up a little and nominate my first video game list for FLC. -- ZooBlazer 06:06, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- "The studio published their first game, Big Match Striker in September 2010" => "The studio published their first game, Big Match Striker, in September 2010"
- Done
- "Supermassive worked on multiple games that utilized" - as it's a British company, that last word should be spelt "utilised"
- Done
- "both of which released in 2010" => "both of which were released in 2010"
- Done
- "In 2012, the studio partnered with BBC" => "In 2012, the studio partnered with the BBC"
- Done
- "BBC announced the decision" => "The BBC announced the decision"
- Done
- "However, another partnership game with BBC" => "However, another partnership game with the BBC"
- Done
- "releasing two spin-off titles; Until Dawn: Rush of Blood (2016) and The Inpatient (2018) for PlayStation VR, Sony's virtual reality headset" => "releasing two spin-off titles, Until Dawn: Rush of Blood (2016) and The Inpatient (2018), for PlayStation VR, Sony's virtual reality headset"
- Done
- "The first game, Man of Medan, released in August 2019" => "The first game, Man of Medan, was released in August 2019"
- Done
- "Supermassive released the standalone game, The Quarry in 2022" => "Supermassive released the standalone game The Quarry in 2022"
- Done
- Titles which begin with "The" should sort based on the next word in the title
- Done
- That's what I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:25, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ChrisTheDude: Thanks for another great review. I think I fixed everything. -- ZooBlazer 16:46, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:59, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pseud 14
In addition to Chris's comments above
- Pete served as CEO -- I think CEO needs to be written in full (lower case)
- Done
- BAFTA Award for Orginal Property -- perhaps it should specify that it is the BAFTA Games Award for Original Property (also typo on original)
- Done and fixed
- for PS VR - should be written in full (since you write second instances in full too, from what it looks like i.e. PlayStation 5, PlayStation 4), or if using acronyms, it should be consistent.
- Changed it so only the first instances are written in full
- Supermassive released PS5 -- same as above
- See above
- Initially the games -- comma after initially
- Done
- Ref(s) = Reference(s) in the table title
- Isn't that what it shows? It says reference(s) when clicking on ref(s). Or are you talking about something else?
- I made the edit - it says references instead of reference(s) (sorry for the nitpick)
- Image review: Passed
- Dont use px sizes (use "upright=numeric value" instead)
- Done
- Images are appropriately licensed
- Images are relevant
- Images have alt text. Pseud 14 (talk) 13:48, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Pseud 14: Thanks for the review! I addressed/commented on everything above. -- ZooBlazer 17:05, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I made a couple edits so it's quicker. Changes look good. Support. Pseud 14 (talk) 18:14, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question
Not a full review, just a question: I've done a lot of "video games by company" lists, so I'm familiar with the various formats used and have usually used wikitables for companies with more like 100 games (e.g. List of 3D Realms games) and templates like {{Video game titles}} for ones with more like 35 or less (e.g. List of id Software games). There's no set guideline, I'm just curious if it was a specific choice for this list or if you went with a wikitable by default. --PresN 20:54, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @PresN I edited the table that was at Supermassive Games and I think I just cleaned it up with a version of what is at List of games by Epic Games. I was already looking at the article since that was the one that helped me with naming this one. -- ZooBlazer 21:12, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support by Chompy Ace
Support. Great job as a nearly flawless list! Also, If you have time would you care for reviewing the List of accolades received by TV Patrol regarding its featured list nomination? Chompy Ace 07:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source review
Since this has substantial support and seems to be missing a source review, thought I'd strike this from the pending list. Version reviewed
Formatting
- Fn 17 - Author last name should be Khan
- Fn 41 - link Supermassive Games as you did with every instance.
Reliability
- As far as I can tell, the sources in question seem to be professional and from well-circulated sites. At the same time, most of the sources I've found here were also largely used in your recent FA (The Dark Pictures Anthology: House of Ashes) which checks out the reliability and quality criteria. Pseud 14 (talk) 20:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Verifiability
- Fn 2 - ok
- Fn 13 - ok
- Fn 25 - ok
- Fn 34 - ok
- Fn 44 - ok
- Fn 54 - ok
- Fn 65 - ok
Great work overall, just a couple of formatting fixes. Pseud 14 (talk) 20:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Pseud 14 Thanks for the source review and for catching those mistakes. Both have been fixed. -- ZooBlazer 22:21, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting. --PresN 16:32, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [3].[reply]
List of erinaceids
I'm back, y'all, with #36 in our perpetual series of mammals lists: hedgehogs! Also gymnures, collectively making up the family Erinaceidae. This kicks off the four families of the order Eulipotyphla, and I've started with a small one at only 24 species. These guys are pretty cute, and more importantly were fairly easy to source. As always, this list follows the pattern of the previous lists and reflects previous FLC comments. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 16:14, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- "Erinaceidae is an family" => "Erinaceidae is a family"
- "A member of this family is [....] and include" - doesn't seem to be grammatically correct
- Wikilink arthropod? Slightly obscure term.....
- That's it! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:31, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChrisTheDude: Done, thanks! --PresN 19:45, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:15, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dylan620
I love hedgehogs and this looks like it will be a fun image review :D saving this space – should have something more substantial here in the next couple days! Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:48, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Following up as promised:
- I'm a little concerned that File:Erinaceus amurensis.jpg lacks authorship information, and the source URL is a dead link. I was able to find archived versions of the site, but I can't figure out where the image would be. I did find a potential alternative on Commons, but the little critter's face isn't clearly visible because it's pointed down away from the camera – could that still be workable?
- Swapped- I agree, the lack of author information or direct link seems suspect
- Not a dealbreaker but I think A. albiventris and A. algirus could be represented by higher-resolution images. I found an excellent A. albiventris photo on Commons. There's also this A. algirus photo that I just cropped from a larger upload (although I do love the belly-up pose in the current photo).
- Swapped both
- Alt text looks good across the board.
- With the exception of the aforementioned E. amurensis photo, licensing and authorship check out for every image used.
- Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:53, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Dylan620: Swapped all, thanks for reviewing! --PresN 01:09, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- AK
- Reminding me of the fact that I have not done any bird lists in a while.
- "A member of this family [...] includes" is still ungrammatical.
- Fixed again
- Conversion error on the 1 cm tail multiple times throughout the article.
- I'm not sure on this- "1–3 cm (0–1 in)" is a little odd, but 1 cm is almost 0 in. The tails are between 0 and 1 in, just not actually 0. Do you have a suggestion?
- Why isn't the 2023 study splitting H. suillus into 6 spp included? Also, you've missed linking the article for the nominate ssp in the list.
- This list (and all of them) follow the WP:MAMMAL standard of "use MSW3's taxonomy, unless both the IUCN and the ASM agree on a change". The IUCN, however, is much more conservative about changes than the ASM- just because a paper is published with a taxonomy revision doesn't mean that it follows it (yet). Unfortunately, wikipedia editors often split up articles based on individual papers instead of following that guideline, so it doesn't always align. Linked the Javan ssp, though.
- Bornean short-tailed gymnure has an image of a live specimen, see that article.
- Image updated.
Comment from ZooBlazer
The article looks great overall, so I have little to say besides that the IUCN red list link for File:Atelerix albiventris range map.png gives a "page cannot be found". -- ZooBlazer 07:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support from Hurricanehink
I came here from my own nature-themed FLC, so figured, why not review a list about some cute little critters?
So some random spotchecking and bits:
- Erinaceidae is one of four families in the order Eulipotyphla.
- This does not appear to be sourced.
- Added
- Should "order" be linked? You linked family and genus (genera).
- Done
- "The twenty-four extant species" - any reason you spell it out? Generally, numbers above ten are spelled as numbers. I take it because you also have two, five, eight, and give, correct?
- Yeah, it's just to match the rest of the sentence.
- It's frequently down for some reason, but it's not dead
- Should conventions be beneath Classification? Or am I just reading things out of order? The Convention seems to be describing what's in the table, right?
- The pattern for these lists is Conventions then Classification, because if there's any extinct species/subspecies (after 1500) Conventions explains the dagger symbol and that 1500CE cutoff; there aren't any for this family, but I'd like to keep the pattern across the lists.
- Is there any way to make it a bit more apparent that the E. europaeus map is focused on Europe and New Zealand? Like, is there any reason it includes the western hemisphere?
- Will crop down to exclude the empty Americas; I've requested autopatrol rights on commons as right now I can't update an image I didn't upload.
- Obligatory complaint that there aren't pictures for every species, but I'm assuming you've tried finding a free version of them?
- Yep, I do my best, but getting free images for east/southeast asian species is frequently challenging.
All in all, it's a good read, and is informative. I was nitpicky about sourcing and such, so I hope my comments aren't too difficult to address. Kudos to your work, @PresN:. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:19, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Hurricanehink: replied inline, thanks for reviewing! --PresN 16:01, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. I had a feeling those would be your responses for a few of them. Since the picture being cropped is a fairly minimal thing, I'm happy to support now. Thanks for making sure we have high-quality science lists. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:07, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Since I'm currently the only active FLC closer, doing an IAR close of my own nomination as promoted. --PresN 16:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [4].[reply]
List of Cobra Kai episodes
- Nominator(s): TheDoctorWho (talk) 09:49, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because as a streaming television series this series has beat all the odds. Television series that are sequels to former film series typically don't fare well, which can be seen with the animated Karate Kid TV series. Those that do, rarely feature large appearances from the original cast. It was also essentially cancelled by YouTube yet managed to find a new service to stream on. On top of that, it survived COVID-19 and the double strikes of 2023. As the original film approaches its forty-year anniversary it feels like the proper time to nominate this. I recently expanded the lead on this, and with the addition of the sixth season table, I believe it should be a featured list. TheDoctorWho (talk) 09:49, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- "Cobra Kai is an American comedy-drama and Martial arts television series" - no need for capital M on martial
- "the first four films in The Karate Kid (franchise)," => "the first four films in The Karate Kid franchise,"
- "picks up 30 years after 1984 titular film" => "picks up 30 years after the 1984 titular film"
- "The series first season" => "The series' first season" (or "The first season of the series")
- "The series first season premiered [....] and released a second season the following year on April 24" - the first season did not release the second season, so this does not make sense grammatically
- "on the then renamed YouTube Premium" => "on the renamed YouTube Premium"
- "as Daniel LaRusso and Johnny Lawrence, respectively" - that comma isn't needed
- "After the series concludes, Sony is" - this doesn't really work grammatically. If I have understood the context correctly, I would suggest "Sony is developing a sixth feature film to be released after the series concludes"
- "a sixth feature film that chronologically includes the 2010 reboot film" - the sixth film will not include the 2010 film, so this doesn't work grammatically
- "Cobra Kai has received critical acclaim[31][32][33] receiving" - comma needed after "acclaim"
- "with each respective seasons release" => "with each respective season's release"
- "As of September 9, 2022, 50 episodes" - that date was nearly 18 months ago, is the sentence still accurate? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:05, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- All done. The sentence is still accurate, per the template instructions that date should only be updated when new episodes air/release. That is the release date of the most recent season. TheDoctorWho (talk) 22:00, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:49, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)
- Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. For the template you're using (in the season lists), visual captions can be added by putting
|caption=caption_text
in the Episode table template; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting|caption={{sronly|caption_text}}
instead. - Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. --PresN 03:47, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Added, thanks for the reminder! TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from ZooBlazer
this was delayed to 2024
- The season was delayed to 2024the end of the first while Thomas Ian Griffith
- Add a comma after firstAs of September 9, 2022, 50 episodes of Cobra Kai have been released, concluding the fifth season.
- This can be moved to the beginning of the episodes section.- It should also be sourced.
That's all I have. Good work on the article. -- ZooBlazer 18:12, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I've addressed your first two points as well as the last one. I'm hoping the third one won't keep you from supporting? I'll move it if I have to, but it's common practice across most List of Episode pages to use this template near the end of the lead. See [5], [6], [7], and [8] which are all featured lists and have this sentence in a similar location. TheDoctorWho (talk) 20:11, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 16:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC) [9].[reply]
Ireland women's cricket team record by opponent
- Nominator(s): RoboCric Let's chat 13:41, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe that it meets all the criteria. I think it has enough content and an organized list to get the featured status. Thanks. RoboCric Let's chat 13:41, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Just a few prose suggestions from someone unfamiliar with the topic and FLCs generally
- Unclear as to why the words "Full Member" are capitalised - when I follow that link the words are not capitalised.
- Done.
- "meaning the Irish women's team" -> "meaning cricket teams"? Given that you mention cricket in the general sense at the start of the sentence.
- Done.
- "being governed by
theCricket Ireland."
- Done.
- "They have the fifth most defeats
forany team in this format." -> "They have the fifth most defeats of any team in this format."
- Done.
- "They have played
thehighest number of matches (25) against the Netherlands" -> "They have played their highest number of matches (25) against the Netherlands". This helps with clarity. I would also shift the bracketed number to the end of the sentence for better flow.
- Done.
- They
alsohave been most successful against the same team, winning 23 WODI matches against them. -> The word also is adding nothing here imo, and then doesn't sound repetitive in the third sentence about the Netherland, though again, I would shift the bracketed number to the end of the sentence.
- Done.
- Ireland made their debut in Women's Test cricket on 30 July 2001 against Pakistan" -> "Ireland made their debut in Women's Test cricket on 30 July 2001, against Pakistan,". This helps to separate the introductory time element from the main clause.
- Done.
- "an innings" -> I presume the wording here is an inning?
- Not done. Perhaps, you're not familiar with cricket. But it is usually said as "1st innings", "by an innings". The article Innings also uses "an innings" at the very beginning. For direct example, see Irish cricket team in Sri Lanka in 2022–23#1st Test.
- "Although the ICC awarded permanent Test status to all full member women's teams in April 2021, it was the only Women's Test match played by Ireland" -> This sentence is exceptionally clunky. First of all, "was" isn't true, as it remains the case. I would consider rewording to something like "In April 2021 the Ireland Women's Cricket Team was awarded permanent Test status, despite the match with Pakistan being Ireland's only Test match. This is because the ICC awarded permanent Test status to all full member women's teams." <- what I have written here is not perfect, and I wouldn't stand by it, but I do think what is in the article is in need of a change.
- Done.
- Which is more correct? "the shorter version of international cricket" or just "short form cricket"? I have no idea but the latter makes more sense to me and is the article title.
- Done.
- So far the article has been clear on whether it was Ireland of the Irish women's team. Is this Ireland's first debut in short form cricket or the Irish women's team's debut? Is it necessary to specify at home?
- Done. Added "women's team" and removed "at home".
- "They have been the second most unsuccessful team in the format, both in terms of matches won as well as winning percentage, among the full member teams." -> "The have been the second most unsuccessful team in the format among the full member teams, both in terms of matches won as well as winning percentage."
- Done.
- "They have recorded the highest number of wins (13) against the Netherlands in the format." - This sentence is strange to me because you don't specify format in the previous sentence. I think the two sentences could be reworked.
- Done.
- "Among the full member countries, they have defeated Zimbabwe most often (6)" -> Lack of units, 6 what? (times).
- Done.
- "Ireland women Test cricket record by opponent" + "Ireland women One Day International record by opponent" + "Ireland women Twenty20 International record by opponent" -> women's?
- Done.
- Should this list feature the Irish cricket flag?
- No, I don't think it should not feature any flag, as other similar featured lists don't contain- New Zealand women's national cricket team record by opponent.
- Xx78900 (talk) 21:23, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Xx78900, I have fixed the necessary issues you mentioned. Please check it and reply here to state whether you support the nomination or not. Thank you for your feedback. RoboCric Let's chat 22:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Drive-by comment
- There's a fairly evident copy & paste error where it says "Year of the first match between New Zealand and the listed opponent" ;-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChrisTheDude I am sorry for the error and I have corrected it. Please check it now. RoboCric Let's chat 01:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Further comments
- "They are full member" => "The team is a full member"
- "They participated in Women's Cricket World Cup" => "They participated in the Women's Cricket World Cup"
- "resulting 49 victories" => "resulting in 49 victories"
- "They have played the most number of matches (25)" => "They have played the highest number of matches (25)"
- "against the Netherlands in Women's Cricket World Cup" => "against the Netherlands in the Women's Cricket World Cup"
- "Although in April 2021, the ICC awarded permanent Test status to all full member women's teams"> "Although the ICC awarded permanent Test status to all full member women's teams in April 2021"
- "when they played against the West Indies in a one-off WT20I at home" - you need to write W20TI in full the first time it's used, the same way you did with WODI
- "Ireland have met with Pakistan for the most number of occasions"> "Ireland have met with Pakistan on the highest number of occasions"
- "they have defeated Zimbabwe for the most number of times (6)"> "they have defeated Zimbabwe most often (6)" (this avoids using "highest number" again.....
- "against whom Ireland have suffered the most number of defeats" => "against whom Ireland have suffered the most defeats"
- " losing all of their 17 matches they played" => " losing all of the 17 matches they played"
- How come there's nothing in the "first" and "last" columns of the WODI table for Netherlands and New Zealand?
- That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:10, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChrisTheDude Done. Fixed all. Thanks. RoboCric Let's chat 10:30, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- Cric editor (talk) 03:35, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from AA
@RoboCric: Just a few suggestions:
- Maybe capitalise "full member" → "Full Member" this is often done, but it's neither here nor there, up to you!
- There was a bit when I looked late last night which mentioned "international arena" and I was going to suggest changing that to "international cricket", but it seems to have been removed from the prose.
- Ref #1, this needs the publication date added.
- Ref #4, is this available on Trove (or elsewhere)? If so, could it be linked into the article? If on Trove, an issue and page number(s) would be a nice addition to the reference.
- This reference also needs Template:Cite news to be used.
- Ref #8 needs to have the author to be attributed and the publication date added.
- Ref #14 links here. Can the original article be linked, or has it been deleted?
- Ref #15, same as above.
- Any CricketArchive references need "|url-access=subscription" adding to them.
- Some references have unused parameters, these can be deleted.
I think that's all I can see so far! (talk) 11:51, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @AssociateAffiliate Hi. The nominator is me, not Cric editor (the user whom you pinged). Thanks. RoboCric Let's chat 11:56, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @AssociateAffiliate I have fixed all of the issues you mentioned. About Ref#4, I couldn't link into a Trove article. So, I replaced that ref with a better online article instead, where the readers can anyway know about Ireland's CWC debut. Thank you for your feedback. RoboCric Let's chat 13:40, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment on sources: Penbugs appears to be a blog with no indication of editorial oversight; can you give your reasoning for why it counts as an RS? --PresN 02:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- @PresN, Hi. Thanks for your comment. To avoid any risks, I replaced that with a better source which obviously count as RS. You may check it now. Best. RoboCric Let's chat 03:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, that sort it out. Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 16:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [10].[reply]
List of James McAvoy performances
- Nominator(s): Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 07:07, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because it meets the criteria for FL everything I spent a bi of time painstakingly sourcing everything on the page. I reached out to another editor (@Lady Lotus:) to co-nominate this with me and they agreed. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 07:07, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
DBC
- I'll do a full review later, but as a drive-by comment I can see both "shared role with" and "shared roles with". Pretty sure it should be the former every time -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:19, 2 March 2024 (UTC) Done[reply]
More comments
- "The following year, he starred in Kevin Macdonald's drama film" => "The following year, he starred in director Kevin Macdonald's drama film" Done
- "the collective title of three films split into three parts" - so the three films were each split into three parts? For a total of nine films? I don't think that's what you mean...... Done
- If you sort on any other column and then re-sort the "year" column back to chronological order, "TBA" jumps to the top, which isn't right. Until such time as it has a confirmed date, you'll need to use a sorting template to make it sort last. Done
- "The Sandman" sorts incorrectly in the TV table Done
- Think that's all I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:38, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChrisTheDude: Done Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 05:55, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pseud 14
In addition to Chris's comments above
- I would drop The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, and link it to 1950s novel instead so it won't appear repetitive. Done
- In most cases I'm guilty of this too, but avoid WP:OFTHESAMENAME as much as possible -- McAvoy was cast as Charles Xavier, based on the Marvel Comics fictional character would be better Done
- I would also refer to X-Men First Class as where he was cast in the role first. i.e. -- McAvoy was cast as Charles Xavier, based on ..., in the superhero film X-Men First Class, or somewhere along those lines. Done
- In the next sentence, you could then state that he reprised the role or he returned to play the role in the film series installments and list them... Done
- Stephen King's 1986 novel of the same name. -- Stephen King's 1986 novel or the 1986 novel by Stephen King are possible ways to write it. Done
- I was wondering why there is only one line in the last paragraph discussing his stage credits. Perhaps this can be expanded and lumped into the lead, as he appears to have at least four Laurence Olivier nominations among the many roles he played, which suggests that it may be notable and perhaps worth including. Done
- That's all from me. Great job on this. Pseud 14 (talk) 16:34, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 05:54, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)
- Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting
|+ caption_text
as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting|+ {{sronly|caption_text}}
instead. Done - Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. --PresN 15:18, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Image review from Dylan620
Helping out a fellow WikiCup participant as a thank-you for approving the DYK hook I submitted recently :) Quick note though, I've converted the "Done" templates into text – the FLC participation instructions discourage graphics and templates containing graphics, as they slow down the load time.
- There is a bit of a representation gap between 2007 and 2013, and again after 2015. At Commons:Category:James McAvoy by year, you can find several quality images of McAvoy from 2008 and 2019. I recommend adding an image from each of those two years. I also recommend putting an image in each of the television and stage sections; maybe 2007, 2008, and 2013 for film, 2019 for television, and 2015 for stage?
- Licensing checks out across the board. Of the four images currently being used, VRT directly received permissions for two of them; the other two are licensed under CC.
- All images are of sufficient quality and contribute encyclopedic value to the listicle.
- Ordinarily I would urge adding alt text, but in this case I think the captions themselves are sufficient and any alt text would be redundant. (The only possible alt text addition I can think of for all four of these images would be to add
alt=Headshot of James McAvoy
, which would not be particularly helpful.)
Once the first point is addressed, I will be comfortable supporting. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:21, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Addressed. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 03:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm a little embarrassed that my suggestion may have done more harm than good. I checked the edits you made while browsing on mobile during a break at work, and the image formatting looked fine. Here on my laptop, though, the images in the television and stage sections are cutting through the section headers below them. I suppose the images in those sections could have their display sizes set to be smaller than the default thumbnail size (so as to match those in the film section), and then one of the images in the television section could be shifted upwards to the end of the film section? Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 23:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Shifted the sizes. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 01:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm a little embarrassed that my suggestion may have done more harm than good. I checked the edits you made while browsing on mobile during a break at work, and the image formatting looked fine. Here on my laptop, though, the images in the television and stage sections are cutting through the section headers below them. I suppose the images in those sections could have their display sizes set to be smaller than the default thumbnail size (so as to match those in the film section), and then one of the images in the television section could be shifted upwards to the end of the film section? Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 23:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed; promoted. --PresN 15:34, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [11].[reply]
List of Hot R&B Singles number ones of 1990
- Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:00, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The history of Billboard's R&B chart moves into a new decade and a lady called Mariah comes along. Something tells me she will go on to be quite successful. Comments as ever will be most gratefully received and swiftly acted upon...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:00, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pseud 14
- Among the acts who in 1990 topped the chart for the first time -- I think it can be written as Among the acts who topped the chart for the first time, since the list is about that year.
- with reported worldwide career sales -- with a reported worldwide career sales
- his first appearance in the peak position when he duetted with -- perhaps it's better to say as when he featured with
- with "The Blues", "Feels Good" and "It Never Rains (In Southern California)" -- serial comma (as you seem to use it in this article)
- That's all from me. Another great list from this series. Pseud 14 (talk) 15:49, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Pseud 14: - thanks for your review. All done except for the second one. "a.... sales" wouldn't make grammatical sense as "sales" is a plural word -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:25, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Pseud 14 (talk) 16:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey man im josh
Source review: Passed
- Reliable enough for the information being cited
- Consistent date formatting
- Consistent and proper reference formatting
- Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
- Spot checks on 9 sources match what they are being cited for
The only thing I could find is, based on the reference, the song "Misunderstanding " should be "Missunderstanding". Great job as always Chris! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:15, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Hey man im josh: - thanks for your review. Fixed the (mis)spelling of the Al B track title -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:25, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Hey man im josh: - thanks for your review. Fixed the (mis)spelling of the Al B track title -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:25, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support from BennyOnTheLoose
Image review
- Images are appropriate to the topic,follow Wikipedia's usage policies, and have succinct captions. Non-free images and other media satisfy the criteria for the inclusion of non-free content and are labeled accordingly. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 22:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing else to add
- To quote MC Hammer, "The chart's legit". Support. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 22:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Promoted. --PresN 15:34, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 8 April 2024 (UTC) [12].[reply]
List of constituencies of the Mizoram Legislative Assembly
I've brought this list up to the standard of the Tripura FL. Criticisms and suggestions for improvement are welcome. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:32, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Dylan620
I'm going to take a closer look at this in the coming days. I do have a couple comments for now:
and the Constitution lays down the general principles of positive discrimination for STs.[4][2]: 35, 137
– it seems a little odd that ref 4 appears before ref 2 here.Mizoram was converted into a state, and the number of constituencies for its legislative assembly was increased to 40.
– this should be directly followed by a source to back it up, especially since it's at the end of a paragraph.
Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:56, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed these two. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:24, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you MPGuy2824. I have some more feedback:
- The prose is generally well-written, but I see a couple incomplete sentences in the first table and would like for those to be fleshed out a bit.
- Done
The 2011 census of India stated that indigenous population constitute 95% of the state's total population.
– mixed verb tenses here.- Fixed
- Images need alt text.
- Fixed
- I am completely unable to access ref 23, which is the source for an entire column of data in the second table :/
- I've added an accessible ref for each row now.
- It may be worth mentioning that while the legislature to make Mizoram a state was passed in 1986, the statehood was not effected until 1987.
- Done
- In order to maintain consistency with the other refs, the websites and/or publishers should be wikilinked (if possible) in refs 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 (which is missing these inputs), 9, 10, and 11 (ditto).
- Fixed
- Refs 7 and 11 have date formats which are inconsistent with the rest of the refs. You may wish to consider adding {{use dmy dates|date=March 2024}} to the top of the page.
- Done
- In ref 2, I'm not sure if "Legislative Department" should be in italics.
- Fixed
- In ref 1, the "live" URL redirects to a directory of legislative assemblies in India.
- Changed the reference
- The article states that the assembly is elected in five-year intervals, and that is indeed the case from 1993 onward, but election intervals before then seem to be irregular. Is there a way this could be explained?
- Info added to lead. Tell me if you think it makes more sense to move the text to the History section.
- On a less critical note, the sources that I successfully checked did verify the information they were used to cite.
- The prose is generally well-written, but I see a couple incomplete sentences in the first table and would like for those to be fleshed out a bit.
- That's what I've got for now. You've done a great job here, but I'm not yet at the point where I would feel comfortable supporting. Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 20:55, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you MPGuy2824. I have some more feedback:
Pseud 14
- This leads to either President's Rule being imposed -- leads to either the President's Rule
- the Scheduled Tribes (ST) (along with the Scheduled Castes) -- I would remove the second parenthetical and just include it as part of the prose.
- That's all I have. Pseud 14 (talk) 21:11, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Pseud 14 (talk) 12:54, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed; promoted. --PresN 15:34, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 12:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [13].[reply]
Snooker world rankings 1983/1984
- Nominator(s): BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 17:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The latest in the series of professional snooker ranking list nominations. The list took tournaments other than the World Snooker Championship into consideration for the first time. I can't claim that it is among the interesting of list articles, but hopefully it's close to meeting the criteria. I can provide extracts from relevant sources to reviewers. Thanks in advance for improvement suggestions. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 17:24, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- Just one thing: when it says "....would receive one "merit" point if they had reached the last-32 of the World Championship", presumably that must mean any of the three world championships relevant to the rankings? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:58, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for reviewing this. I realised that although the merit points were awarded at one time, I can break it out to show which tournaments they relate to. I'll ping you nce I've done that. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 12:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- ChrisTheDude I've broken out the merit points per tournament, and tweaked the wording. (You may have a better form of words for me than "in scope"). Thanks, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 13:40, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:08, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pseud 14
- A ranking list for the 1983/84 snooker season -- for consistency, I think this should be written as 1983–84 snooker season and similar to how 1976–77 season is written.
- Amended. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 11:11, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- (1981, 1982 and 1983 World Snooker Championship) -- World Snooker Championship can be dropped, since it is already described as such in the preceding statement. I would also suggest linking it to the 1983 article, if that is the same competition it refers to.
- Amended. I didn't link to 1983 as it is linked shortly beforehand, but can add an additoonal link if you feel that would benefit readers. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 11:11, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- (which were those ranked lower than 28th) -- I think this can be written into the statement without the parenthetical
- Amended to use commas - I'm open to other suggestions. 11:11, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- many thanks, Pseud 14. Let me know if anything else is required. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 11:11, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Image review: Passed
- Image has alt text
- Image is appropriately licensed
- Image has succinct caption and is relevant. Pseud 14 (talk) 19:41, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 11:11, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source review
- Hello I will preform the source review and look at all nine of the sources and confirm that they are accurate. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 03:07, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- REF1 Snooker Scene reliable ✓ Pass
- REF2 Chris Turner's Snooker Archive, reliable has been archived and info matches✓ Pass
- REF3 Global Snooker Centre✓ Pass
- REF4 Snooker Scene reliable✓ Pass
- REF5 Snooker Scene reliable✓ Pass
- REF6 The CueSport Book of Professional Snooker: The Complete Record & History seems relaible✓ Pass
- REF7 The Cruel Game reliable✓ Pass
- REF8 Snooker Scene reliable✓ Pass
- REF9 Birmingham Evening Mail reliable , I would link to it though✓ Pass
- SUPPORT Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 04:13, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, OlifanofmrTennant. I've linked Birmingham Evening Mail. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 09:31, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting. --PresN 01:45, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 12:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [14].[reply]
Municipalities of Puebla
Yet another list of municipalities with a standardized format that now includes 43 (!!) lists in North American jurisdictions. Inspired by real encyclopedias with consistent formatting and high standards, I'm helping to achieve this for lists of municipalities. I tried to incorporate changes from previous nominations but I'm sure I've missed some and there can always be improvements. Thanks for your reviews Mattximus (talk) 19:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)
- Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting
|+ caption_text
as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting|+ {{sronly|caption_text}}
instead. - Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear. I don't return to these reviews until the nomination is ready to close, so ping me if you have any questions. --PresN 15:19, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- MPGuy2824's comments
- "Every three years, citizens elect a municipal president (Spanish: presidente municipal) by a plurality voting system who heads a concurrently elected municipal council (ayuntamiento) responsible for providing all the public services for their constituents." to "Every three years, citizens elect a municipal president (Spanish: presidente municipal), by a plurality voting system, who heads a concurrently elected municipal council (ayuntamiento) which is responsible for providing all the public services for their constituents." Done
- "user fees" might need a wikilink (or an explanation). Done - the wikilink is actually quite good.
- a couple of refs seem to follow the y-m-d format for dates, while most of the article seems to follow mdy. This should be consistent throughout the article. Done MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:12, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- "who heads a concurrently elected municipal council (ayuntamiento) " - this Spanish word is not in italics, but others are.....? Done
- That's it, I think! :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:07, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:12, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dank
Planning to review this, but I'll probably wait for MPGuy2824's reaction (I see they are away until the 25th). Also, just want to be clear that I don't read Spanish, so my review will be more in the nature of checking-the-boxes, and I'm hoping someone will look at this who can read the sources. - Dank (push to talk) 12:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
- Checking the FLC criteria:
- 1. Nothing is jumping out at me as a prose problem. (I've mentioned before that I'm not happy about the redundancies in the Municipalities section, but not unhappy enough to hold up promotion.) I checked sorting on all sortable nonnumeric columns and sampled the links in the table.
- 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
- 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
- 3b. The sources appear to be reliable, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
- 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
- 4. It is navigable.
- 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the images seem fine.
- 6. It is stable.
- Support. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 14:06, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 01:45, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [15].[reply]
List of roles and awards of Rachelle Ann Go
After recently expanding the main article of Filipino singer Rachelle Ann Go, here's her work and awards list which I have lumped into one article, tailored to FLs like List of roles and awards of Oscar Isaac and List of roles and awards of Catherine Zeta-Jones. Happy to address your comments and thanks to all who take the time to review the list. Pseud 14 (talk) 02:35, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from ZooBlazer
for which she won the Myx Music Award for Favorite Mellow Video
- I think this is missing a ref. The ref before mentions being nominated, but doesn't mention winning, while the following ref doesn't seem to mention the award at all.
- As a note, the lead doesn't need to be cited if the information listed are in the table. This is Ref 57 in the awards table
earning the Awit Award for Best R&B Recording
- Also seems to be missing a ref.
- Same Ref 45 in the awards table
For the production, she won the Star Award for Revival Album of the Year, and garnered nominations for Female Recording Artist of the Year and Female Pop Artist of the Year at the 2009 ceremony. Another single from the album, "This Time I'll Be Sweeter", earned her a Best Mellow Video nomination at the 2010 Myx Music Awards
- Same issue for all of this. If it's in ref #7, then my bad. That ref is only partially translating for me.
- Ref 63 in the awards table. Ref 7 supports her "guest role" on Diva
She then became a mentor in the reality talent show Protégé: The Battle for the Big Break (2011)
- Ditto as above.
- Ref 26 on the television table
She won the BroadwayWorld Philippines Award for Best Actress in a Musical for the role
- Ditto
- Ref 49 on the awards table
For the show, she received the BroadwayWorld UK Award for Best Featured Actress in a New Production of a Musical
- I don't see this in either of the following two refs.
- Ref 50 on the awards table
winning Best Female Performance in a Long-Running West End Show at the BroadwayWorld UK Awards
- Ref?
- Ref 51
For her performance in the latter, Go won a BroadwayWorld UK Award for Best Actress in a New Production of a Musical. She has since reprised her roles in various productions and tours of Les Misérables (2019–2022) and Hamilton (2023–2024).
Needs a ref or refs.
- Ref 52 for the award, and Ref 38 to 41 for the last sentence in the lead.
Overall, it seems like a lot of stuff isn't cited in the body of the article, although I'm pretty sure at least some useful refs are in the tables below. -- ZooBlazer 06:37, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @ZooBlazer: thanks for your review. Generally, anything mentioned/supported in the tables don't need to be cited in the lead. Awards, filmographies, discographies, and similar types of FLs such as this are examples (List of roles and awards of Oscar Isaac, List of roles and awards of Angeline Quinto, List of awards and nominations received by Anne Hathaway). Let me know if I missed a ref that doesn't support prose in the lead. Happy to revise otherwise. Pseud 14 (talk) 12:57, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Pseud 14: Huh, that's the first I've heard of that, although I'm still relatively new to FLC. Happy to Support since you brought up all the refs that cover the info. -- ZooBlazer 16:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @ZooBlazer: thanks for your support. I believe, similar to standard articles, list articles also conform to MOS:CITELEAD, where everything that is repeated in the body or tables don't need to be cited. As long as it is supported in the body, having citations in the lead section is optional, but is also allowed if it is a preference :) Pseud 14 (talk) 18:08, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Pseud 14: Huh, that's the first I've heard of that, although I'm still relatively new to FLC. Happy to Support since you brought up all the refs that cover the info. -- ZooBlazer 16:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- "She signed with Viva Records and worked with producer Eugene Villaluz for her self-titled debut studio album" - "She signed with Viva Records and worked with producer Eugene Villaluz on her self-titled debut studio album" would be more natural English
- Done
- "received the MTV Pilipinas for Favorite Female Video." - surely the awards weren't simply called the "MTV Pilipinas", which was the name of the TV station? Surely they were called "MTV Pilipanas Awards" or similar? The title of our article on the awards suggests so.....
- You're right, the award is called "MTV Pilipinas Music Awards", but the wiki article for the specific award I think was improperly named. I've corrected it to MTV Pilipinas Music Award for Favorite Female Video
- "starring as the titular fictional character." - I think just "starring as the titular character" is fine. I don't think we need to clarify that the titular character in a show about a mermaid is fictional :-)
- Lol, this made me laugh. Very true. Revised.
- In the awards table, "MTV Pilipinas Music Award" should be "MTV Pilipinas Music Awards"
- Done
- "at West End's Sondheim Theater in 2019" => "at the Sondheim Theatre in London's West End in 2019" (note the UK spelling of theatre)
- Done. Also got a question, with proper nouns, if outside of the UK and they are written as Meralco Theater, should I retain that? Or as a matter of consistency use Theatre? (I would guess the British vs American variation only applies for usage as a common noun)
- You would simply use whatever the actual name of the place is. So, if you were writing about New York you would use Hayes Theater because that's how it's spelt, but you would use Hudson Theatre because (for some reason) that's how that one is spelt -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:24, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChrisTheDude: Thanks for clarifying. This makes perfect sense now. And thanks for your edits on the main article too. Pseud 14 (talk) 13:48, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Also got a question, with proper nouns, if outside of the UK and they are written as Meralco Theater, should I retain that? Or as a matter of consistency use Theatre? (I would guess the British vs American variation only applies for usage as a common noun)
- That's it I think, great work as ever!! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:22, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for taking on the review ChrisTheDude. All comments actioned. Let me know if there's anything I might have missed. Pseud 14 (talk) 23:34, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:24, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey man im josh
Source review: Passed
- Reliable enough for the information being cited
- Consistent date formatting
- Consistent and proper reference formatting
- Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
- Spot checks on 10 sources match what they are being cited for
Review notes:
- Note that my review does not include a review of the references to television episodes, as that's not a format that I'm familiar with or have evaluated before, so I'm assuming good faith in this instane.
- Thanks for raising that. I believe it was in this similar nomination that a reviewer highlighted that we could use Template:Cite episode, which is also generally acceptable for information such as cast and personnel credits, episode titles, etc.
- Refs 15 and 37 are the same
- Thanks for catching this. Fixed
- Refs 8 and 22 are the same
- Also fixed. I don't know how I missed that too.
- Ref 41 – Include |location=Abu Dhabi
- Added
- Refs 62 and 63 – Wikilink to News.ABS-CBN.com instead of ABS-CBNnews.com
- Done
- Ref 61 – Needs a url-access tag, similar to that of ref 42's
- I believe the url-access tag is already in place.
That's what I've got. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:37, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for your review Hey man im josh, and for looking into the references. All actioned. Let me know if I might have missed anything. Pseud 14 (talk) 17:46, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Hey man im josh: gentle poke ;) Howdy! Just checking in if everything has been addressed satisfactorily? Pseud 14 (talk) 14:34, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting. --PresN 01:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [16].[reply]
List of Green Bay Packers starting quarterbacks
- Nominator(s): « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:07, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For quite some time I have been working on List of Green Bay Packers starting quarterbacks and at this point I think it meets all of the FL criteria. There are three items I want to pre-emptively bring up in this nomination though, for clarification:
- Unlike some other starting quarterbacks lists, this list does not include any statistics. Imho, statistics other than games, starts and QB record is superfluous to this topic and better covered in existing list (in this case, List of Green Bay Packers records, which is described and linked in the See also section). Yards, passes, etc are all accumulated regardless of whether a QB starts or not. Note, WP:FLCR #3(c) states that a FL should
not largely duplicate material from another article
. - There are two existing team quarterback start FLCs: List of Minnesota Vikings starting quarterbacks (passed in Nov 2009) and List of Los Angeles Chargers starting quarterbacks (passed in Jan 2023). You will notice that both utilize a static table instead of a sortable table. I chose a different style table for a couple reasons: first, this is a list of players (specifically starting QBs), thus I feel like the reader expectation is a list of quarterbacks, not a list of seasons. Second, the sortable table provides a lot more functionality to understand who started the most games, who had the best record, etc. I believe this layout also speaks more closely to satisfying WP:FLCR #4
Structure. It is easy to navigate and includes, where helpful, section headings and table sort facilities.
- Unlike the two existing team quarterback start FLCs, the Packers history dates back well before 1950. In my fairly exhaustive research, there are no reliable sources showing quarterback starts or win/loss record prior to 1950. PFR doesn't list them and even in individual player pages, it only shows total starts, not starts by position (and no QB record). Let's take Arnie Herber, the premier passer in the early era of he NFL. Cliff Christl said this about him: "Although inducted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame as a quarterback, Herber started only two games there during his 11 seasons with the Packers, and both were in his rookie year". Herber started as a right halfback for most of his career. Thus, for this list, the cut-off is 1950, when my source (PFR) provides reliable information showing QB starts. All other pre-1950 Packers QBs aren't included (note, {{Green Bay Packers starting quarterback navbox}} still has these included; assuming consensus forms here on this issue and this FLC promotes, I would then utilize this list to update the template).
With all that said, I appreciate any feedback and look forward to addressing any concerns. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:07, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source review: Passed
- Reliable enough for the information being cited
- Consistent date formatting
- Consistent and proper reference formatting
- Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
- Spot checks on 14 sources match what they are being cited for
Source review comments:
- Ref 23 – I'm not sure I understand why this is listed as Milwaukee Journal Sentinel as the newspaper. Packersnews.com is part of the USA Today network according to the site.
- Refs 16 and 33 – Duplicate source (Lynn Dickey packers.com)
- Refs 17 and 54 – Duplicate source (Bart Starr packers.com)
- Refs 15 and 52 – Duplicate source (Tobin Rote packers.com)
- Refs 18 and 35 – Duplicate source (Brett Favre praises staff... Sports Illustrated)
- What makes quirkyresearch.com a reliable source?
- I know we talked about the history.com source, so I assume you didn't find a better one. If it helps, I've got a couple sources ([17], [18]) from the PFHOF that I think would be adequate to verify the portion that the history.com source is there for. Could at least be good to supplement the existing reference, if not replace it.
A relevant and confusing point from the Packers' media guide that supports the 1950 cutoff: Prior to 1950, most players played both offense and defense... Backs were listed as quarterbacks, halfbacks and fullbacks, but were often interchangeable on offense, especially in Curly Lambeau’s Notre Dame Box system.
It's no secret that it's painful to determine who was the "starting quarterback" and, as you mentioned, oftentimes teams did not have a quarterback start the game. I've found the same issue that Gonzo did when trying to make up similar lists and determine a player's position, but it gets real murky prior to 1950.
Good work Gonzo, I like how the list came together! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:05, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks Hey man im josh, I think I have addressed all of your comments. Thanks for the reminder and reference to replace the History.com one. The MJS was just my bad, changed to PackersNews. I replaced QuirkyResearch as well. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 19:20, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks good. Support. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:35, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- Wikilink "quarterback"!!
- Wikilink "line of scrimmage"
- "the significance of he position" - missing T off "the"
- "with team's assigning significant resources" - there should not be an apostrophe in teams
- "The emergence of he dual-threat quarterback" - T has gone missing agaimn
- "Five of those quarterbacks though have started over 75% of the team's games" - can you find a way to reword this to convey what I think you are trying to get across? Saying "five QBs started 75% of the games" could imply that QB1 started 70% and the other four 1% each.......
- "Tobin Rote, the team's primary starter in the 1950s and" - needs a comma after 1950s
- "and the Lynn Dickey" - *the* Lynn Dickey?
- "Tobin Rote started 73 games as the Packers quarterback in the early 1950s." - aprostophe needed after Packers
- Same in the Starr caption
- Re: winning %, I presume that ties were/are not included in this stat? Because Bratkowski's four wins out of nine games doesn't equal 50%. Might be worth clarifying this in the tooltip.
- That's it, I think! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:04, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the review ChrisTheDude, the only comment I have a question on is the "75% of the games" comment. I see what you are saying, but looking at the preceding and following sentences, I think it makes sense. I state that 33 QBs have started for the Packers, then say that of those 33, 5 make up 75% of the total QB starts. The following sentences then list out those QBs. I think in your example, if one of those QBs started 70% of the games, I would say that instead of saying 5 started 75%. I think the idea is that 5 QBs started 75% of the games, while the other 28 started 25% of the games. This dichotomy of that is the takeaway, with clarification provided in the following sentences and the table. I did make a slight change to the sentence after to try to clarify. Do you have any specific recommendations? « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:44, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- How about "Five of those quarterbacks each made over 100 starts and between them started over 75% of the team's games"? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:54, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- ChrisTheDude, I made the change (although its over 70 starts for each). « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:16, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, I only looked at the top four rows in the table (when sorted in descending order of starts) because apparently I can't count to five :-D Anyway, happy now to support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:21, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- ChrisTheDude, I made the change (although its over 70 starts for each). « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:16, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- How about "Five of those quarterbacks each made over 100 starts and between them started over 75% of the team's games"? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:54, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the review ChrisTheDude, the only comment I have a question on is the "75% of the games" comment. I see what you are saying, but looking at the preceding and following sentences, I think it makes sense. I state that 33 QBs have started for the Packers, then say that of those 33, 5 make up 75% of the total QB starts. The following sentences then list out those QBs. I think in your example, if one of those QBs started 70% of the games, I would say that instead of saying 5 started 75%. I think the idea is that 5 QBs started 75% of the games, while the other 28 started 25% of the games. This dichotomy of that is the takeaway, with clarification provided in the following sentences and the table. I did make a slight change to the sentence after to try to clarify. Do you have any specific recommendations? « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:44, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pseud 14
- They are members of the North Division of the National Football Conference (NFC) -- the acronym in the parenthetical can be dropped as this is not repeated elsewhere in the article or the tables.
- Starting in 1950, total wins and losses by a team's starting quarterback began being tracked. -- Perhaps some tweaking here so it doesn't become repetitive. Something like Beginning in 1950, total wins and losses by a team's starting quarterback were tracked
- That's all from me. Pseud 14 (talk) 15:10, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks Pseud 14. I made your first suggested change. Regarding #2, I left it in there because I feel like "NFC", at least for general football fans, is more readily noticeable than the full "National Football Conference". I also did this because North Division is actually linked to NFC North. Thoughts? MOS:ACRO notes common exceptions for something that is more commonly known by its acronym, which I think NFC is. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Pseud 14 (talk) 17:10, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Image review: Passed
- Images are appropriately licensed
- Images have alt text
- Images have succinct captions and are relevant. Pseud 14 (talk) 15:10, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting. --PresN 01:45, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [19].[reply]
List of FIFA Women's World Cup finals
The Women's World Cup wrapped up a few months ago, but I've had my eye on improving this list for a while and decided to dedicate an evening to doing just that tonight after watching the W Gold Cup. The list's existing elements were all preserved while a substantial amount of prose with good citations was added; most of it was modeled after the list of men's finals, a relatively ancient FL, with some modern tweaks. (This is my second concurrent nomination, but my first has three supports.) SounderBruce 06:05, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- MPGuy2824's comments
- "continental competitions alongside the hosts, who have an automatic berth" to "continental competitions, alongside the hosts who have an automatic berth"
- Fixed.
- "the two remaining teams beyond the semifinal round" can be simplified to "the two winning/successful teams of the semifinal round, "
- Reworded to use "advanced from the semifinal round".
- " The hosted by Australia and New Zealand in 2023" - a word got eaten somewhere.
- Fixed.
- See if you want make the country name into a header cell in each row. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:39, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Hey man im josh
Source review: Passed
- Reliable enough for the information being cited
- Consistent date formatting
- Consistent and proper reference formatting
- Ref 14, 17, and 20 – Needs url-access parameter specified, as when I visit the links I'm being told I need a subscription to view them.
- Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
- Spot checks on 8 sources match what they are being cited for
Other comments:
- This could do with a run of iabot
- Will do so once a few of the sources are archived by the Wayback Machine.
- Missing row scopes in the results by nation table.
- Fixed.
- They key calls out "Match was decided during extra time", but this isn't used anywhere in the list.
- Hidden until needed.
- Caption for the 2023 final image could use a period at the end.
- Added.
That's all I've got, good stuff as always SounderBruce! Hey man im josh (talk) 17:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Hey man im josh: Thanks for the comments. I have addressed all of the issues that were pointed out. SounderBruce 01:28, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Good stuff, support! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:03, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- "it was retroactively given the World Cup moniker" - maybe say what it was actually billed as at the time?
- Added the name, which is quite silly.
- "The United States are the most successful team [...] Germany has two titles" - one is plural but the other singular?
- Moved USWNT to singular.
- "The most recent final, hosted by Australia and New Zealand in 2023" - both nations didn't host the final
- Fixed by moving the final's article to the bit after the semicolon.
- "The original FIFA Women's World Cup Trophy is used for the final match" - how is it "used" for the final if it isn't presented to the winning team? Is it just displayed at the stadium or something?
- Added that it is awarded but otherwise kept at the museum.
- So, to clarify, the winning team gets two trophies? Currently the article says "The team that wins the final receives the FIFA Women's World Cup Winner's Trophy, which is engraved with the winning team's names. The original FIFA Women's World Cup Trophy, awarded to the winning team", which makes it sound like two different trophies with (slightly) different names are involved, but both those links redirect to the same place and I couldn't figure out the answer from that section. If it's indeed correct that they get two trophies, then I would change "awarded" to "which is also presented" in the second sentence -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChrisTheDude: There are two trophies; I have rewritten the section to hopefully make it a bit more clear. FIFA keeps the original, and a replica is given to the winner (presumably through the federation). SounderBruce 08:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- So, to clarify, the winning team gets two trophies? Currently the article says "The team that wins the final receives the FIFA Women's World Cup Winner's Trophy, which is engraved with the winning team's names. The original FIFA Women's World Cup Trophy, awarded to the winning team", which makes it sound like two different trophies with (slightly) different names are involved, but both those links redirect to the same place and I couldn't figure out the answer from that section. If it's indeed correct that they get two trophies, then I would change "awarded" to "which is also presented" in the second sentence -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Added that it is awarded but otherwise kept at the museum.
- Think that's all I got, great work as ever SB! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:18, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChrisTheDude: Thanks for the review! I didn't see this one initially in my watchlist, but have finished the changes before I head out on a road trip. SounderBruce 08:07, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:50, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 01:45, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC) [20].[reply]
List of Dallas Cowboys first-round draft picks
- Nominator(s): Hey man im josh (talk) 16:33, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is my 6th in the NFL team's first-round picks series and, if all goes well, it'll be the 26th list in the series promoted. I will, as always, do my best to respond quickly and address all comments, questions, and criticisms. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:33, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pseud 14
- team based in Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex. -- based in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex
- defensive tackle from TCU -- perhaps the university name and the team name should be written in full on this instance.
- Suggest alt text to File:Super Bowl 44 Emmitt Smith image.
- That's all from me. Great work. Pseud 14 (talk) 20:34, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Great feedback @Pseud 14! I've implemented all of your suggestions. Thank you very much for the review =) Hey man im josh (talk) 11:27, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Pseud 14 (talk) 12:34, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- "have played their home games at AT&T Stadium in Arlington, Texas, since 2009" - don't think that comma is needed
- "Dallas traded their 2008 first-, fifth, and seventh-round selections" - shouldn't there by a hyphen after "fifth" as well?
- That's all I got! Great work as ever! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:42, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"have played their home games at AT&T Stadium in Arlington, Texas, since 2009" - don't think that comma is needed
– Wouldn't WP:GEOCOMMA apply?- Apparently it would. This is a new one on me but then of course I am British and we don't have an equivalent to writing "X has done Y in Arlington, Texas, since [date]" because we don't have states...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:15, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Dallas traded their 2008 first-, fifth, and seventh-round selections" - shouldn't there by a hyphen after "fifth" as well?
– Good catch, fixed and found another instance of this mistake as well. Did a ctrl+F to try to find any other similar mistakes and I think we're good now.
- Thanks so much for the review @ChrisTheDude! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:01, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:15, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dylan620
Gotta hand it to you Josh, you've been an absolute machine with these first-round draft pick lists. I should have an image review done in the next couple days! Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 22:51, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you! I've already got another 3 prepped and should be finished the last 3 in the series by the end of the week :P Hey man im josh (talk) 15:23, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Goodness, that is seriously impressive – talk about planning ahead! Image review passes, details below:
- All images present are licensed either CC or PD. I wasn't able to access the original Flickr upload for the Irvin photo, but the Commons editor who confirmed the license is one whose judgment I trust, so I am going to AGF.
- All images have suitable alt text. It might not hurt to mention in Aikman's alt text that he is wearing a suit since such is mentioned in the alt text for Smith's photo, and roughly equal amounts of their suits are shown in frame, but that's a minor point.
- All images are high-quality and contribute encyclopedic value. I like that White is shown wearing a cowboy hat – it's only fitting!
- All captions are well-written, and the sources verify the information that they're used to cite.
- Support on images; excellent work again! Dylan620 (he/him • talk • edits) 19:43, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Goodness, that is seriously impressive – talk about planning ahead! Image review passes, details below:
- Source review (Passed)
- Not source related, but Note R says
for their 1993 fourth-, eighth, and two second-round selections
, which is sort of confusing. What were the fourth and eighth picks? Also are you missing a dash after eighth? - Not source related, but consider adding one more photo of a recent draft pick? Micah Parsons or CeeDee Lamb maybe?
- Ref 41: what makes Inside the Star reliable? It is a blog, right?
- Otherwise, all sources appear reliable, are consistently formatted and all spot checks looked good. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Gonzo fan2007:
- I was missing a dash. This particular trade included two second-round picks, which made it difficult to word and I tried to dance around it.
- Recommend rewording, it still doesn't make much sense. Maybe
to the Green Bay Packers in exchange for both of their 1993 second-round selections, as well as a fourth- and eighth-round selection in the same year (Nos. 46, 54, 94, and 213 overall).
- Recommend rewording, it still doesn't make much sense. Maybe
- Added Parsons
- Removed, apparently ref 41 was redundant after looking into it.
- Thank you very much for the review! Hey man im josh (talk) 23:38, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- One other comment: List of Dallas Cowboys seasons seems superfluous in the See also section. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:11, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I've reworded it again, based on your feedback. I do personally think that the list of seasons is relevant to the list of picks, as each season determines the picks that teams will have in the very next season, but I recognize that not everybody feels the same way. For now, I feel as though it's harmless if not potentially beneficial for some. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:10, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, source review passed. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:40, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I've reworded it again, based on your feedback. I do personally think that the list of seasons is relevant to the list of picks, as each season determines the picks that teams will have in the very next season, but I recognize that not everybody feels the same way. For now, I feel as though it's harmless if not potentially beneficial for some. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:10, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- One other comment: List of Dallas Cowboys seasons seems superfluous in the See also section. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:11, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Gonzo fan2007:
Promoting. --PresN 01:45, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.