Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/November 18

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Today's featured article for November 18, 2024
Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 18, 2024
Picture of the day for November 18, 2024

The featured picture for this day has not yet been chosen.

In general, pictures of the day are scheduled in order of promotion to featured status. See Wikipedia:Picture of the day/Guidelines for full guidelines.

Poorly sourced and low quality articles[edit]

diff link = Please do not remove high quality WP:GA rated or WP:FA rated materials and replace it with poor quality, inadequately sourced low rated pages. -- Cirt (talk) 17:48, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

diff link = Articles Time zone and 1929 Grand Banks earthquake have multiple problems and unaddressed issues. Please, do not add these poor quality pages back to this Selected anniversaries page. Thank you, -- Cirt (talk) 12:03, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
diff link = Battle of Berlin (air) and Push-button telephone = these articles are poor quality and have multiple problems, and should not be displayed on the Main Page in their present states. They were added replacing high quality pages, Calvin and Hobbes and Aggie Bonfire. For the 3rd time, high quality pages were removed and replaced with poor quality pages. Talk page discussion, here, would be appreciated. -- Cirt (talk) 17:32, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See the bolded wording at page, Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/doc, which reads: "Please note that the events listed on the Main Page are chosen based more on relative article quality and to maintain a mix of topics, not based solely on how important or significant their subjects are.". (Bolding emphasis is in the original) Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 17:59, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Poorly sourced entries have been added back, see diff link. These should not be added back to the page, hidden commented out or otherwise, until properly sourced. -- Cirt (talk) 13:29, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No no no, they should stay hidden at least. Look at any other day's page; there are usually a number of hidden items that are noted as needing better citations or whatever. Then next year, when someone comes around to update the page, they can always check those articles to see if they've improved. This makes it more convenient for this editor, even if it's yourself -- now you don't need to go and do the research anymore. If the article is still in poor quality, then you leave it hidden. If it's improved, it can be moved back into the pool. But if you remove it, you just make more work for the updating editor. Get it? howcheng {chat} 01:06, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Respectfully disagree, we do not want to allow for the possibility of someone carelessly adding back poorly sourced entries or articles with tagged issues for display on the Main Page. However, you appear to be determined to repeatedly add back the poorly sourced entries, so it is not worth getting into a tiffy over. Hopefully the poorly sourced entries will not be displayed in the future until all issues have been appropriately fixed. -- Cirt (talk) 02:46, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Steamboat Willie[edit]

Removed this one. Multiple unaddressed issues, including WP:NOR violations, WP:V violations, and completely unreferenced chunks. -- Cirt (talk) 17:46, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

King's Cross fire[edit]

Removed this entry, as there are multiple unaddressed issues with the page, including significant sourcing concerns throughout the entire article. -- Cirt (talk) 17:48, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unam sanctam[edit]

Removed this entry, due to multiple unaddressed issues, including sourcing concerns - over-usage of primary sources and under-usage of secondary references, as well as referencing issues throughout the article page. -- Cirt (talk) 17:50, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Haakon VII of Norway[edit]

Removed this entry, due to sourcing concerns. Multiple unaddressed issues with this article. Large portions are unsourced. Entire sections of this page on a person have no references whatsoever. The article fails core Wikipedia policies, including WP:V. -- Cirt (talk) 17:52, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2012 notes[edit]

howcheng {chat} 13:38, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2013 notes[edit]

howcheng {chat} 06:54, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2014 notes[edit]

howcheng {chat} 08:00, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2015 notes[edit]

howcheng {chat} 08:34, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May I recommend the pictured one be changed to Calvin and Hobbes, seeing as it is its 30th anniversary and thus noteworthy? :-) Stolengood (talk) 02:35, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Alas, there are no public domain images of the comic strip. howcheng {chat} 07:19, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Damn. :-( Not even a free use? Stolengood (talk) 19:35, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2016 notes[edit]

howcheng {chat} 07:33, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2017 notes[edit]

howcheng {chat} 08:22, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2018 notes[edit]

howcheng {chat} 02:17, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2019 notes[edit]

howcheng {chat} 17:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2020 notes[edit]

howcheng {chat} 05:08, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2021 notes[edit]

howcheng {chat} 17:31, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]