User talk:Bolideleoi

Bolideleoi, you are invited to the Co-op![edit]

Hi there! Bolideleoi, you are invited to The Co-op, a gathering place for editors where you can find mentors to help you build and improve Wikipedia. If you're looking for an editor who can help you out, please join us! I JethroBT (I'm a Co-op mentor)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:40, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shahjahanpur Thana has been accepted[edit]

Shahjahanpur Thana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 02:58, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Shilpa Nagar has been accepted[edit]

Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Shilpa Nagar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Broc (talk) 11:34, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Are Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Shilpa Nagar and Mirsarai Economic Zone same? I was going to merge them then realized that they may be seperate. Mehedi Abedin 11:20, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to this Dhaka Tribune article, Mirsarai Economic Zone has been consolidated into Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Shilpa Nagar, so the MEZ page should be redirected to BSMSN Bolideleoi (talk) 12:42, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alliance Française de Dhaka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Financial Express. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Bolideleoi (talk) 11:45, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mana Bay (April 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Xkalponik was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Moreover, out of the 4 sources, 3 are press releases, which is something we don't count as reliable. Rewriting is needed along with the removal of PR sources, and introduction of reliable, independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mana Bay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

X (talk) 16:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bolideleoi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! X (talk) 16:27, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mana Bay (April 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vinegarymass911 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mana Bay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vinegarymass911 (talk) 13:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit on Ramna[edit]

I see that you have made an edit on Ramna Thana. You have included several misinformation.

*Ramna is in both DSCC and DNCC: No theyre not. After the creation of Hatirjheel Thana, The part of Ramna that was in DNCC that included areas like New Eskaton and Mogbazar, they are now in the thana of Hatirjheel

*Geography: I really dont blame this on you because banglapedia is outdated but the portions of Ramna that used border Rampura and Tejgaon I/A is now Hatirjheel. You will see that Banglapedia is yet to release articles on the newer thanas such as Hatirjheel and Banani (which had been separated from Gulshan). I havent made any change as you have mentioned "As of 2012".

*Institutes located in Ramna: Nagar Bhaban is in Shahbagh Thana. Shilpakala, Secratariat are located at Segunbagicha which is located in Shahbagh Thana. Supreme Court is also in Shahbagh Thana, next to Segunbagicha.

Also the mentions of Dhaka University, Bangla Academy and Suhrawardy Udyan has also been removed because, although they were initially in Ramna, are now in Shahbagh.

I have made some changes accordingly

Uss157 (talk) 15:35, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I appreciate you reaching out regarding my changes. Addressing your concerns:

1. I took that from the latest 2022 census, which lists Ramna Thana separately under both Dhaka North and Dhaka South city corporations (see pages 386 to 387 of the National Report) and added the two separate population figures.

2. Yes, I'm aware. Unfortunately, I couldn't find any reliable updated sources (like maps) that delineates the latest thana boundaries, so I decided to publish the latest verifiable info that I knew of.

3. I've consulted the source (2012) again and found that some of those places are listed as part of both Ramna and Shahbagh thanas. I'm not really too worried about the exclusion of conflicting facts. BTW you can read the book here if you'd like to verify it. I've also got a compiled PDF if you'd like.

After all, verifiability is one of the three core content policies of Wikipedia, and my edits were strictly in line with it. I've no qualms about content that doesn't violate WP policies. Bolideleoi (talk) 16:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]